22 Jul 2014
There's been further divergence in recent years. The top performers continue to push the boundaries beyond what was thought feasible just a few years ago. But if the sector as a whole is to reach its potential, it is the rest of the herd who need to improve.
"If you were marking the industry on the progress of its five-year plan, the scorecard wouldn’t read well."
Cameron Bagrie and Con Williams, Chief economist at ANZ NZ and Rural economist at ANZ NZ
One such piece is a divergence in financial performance between top farmers and the rest of the industry. From an industry-wide perspective the potential to increase on-farm performance is immense, with the top performers in the sector returning at least three times average levels.
Demand is not an issue. Asia wants more New Zealand red meat, a lot more. Rather growth will come from building on-farm supply side capacity through improving profitability and increasing investment.
This will be supported by emerging market demand, modernisation of the food chain in new markets, the westernisation of emerging Asian (and particularly Chinese) consumer preferences, opening up of new cultural segments, preferential access to a wide range of markets and strengthening business relationships between New Zealand and key multinational foodservices and retailers.
As Chinese President Xi Jinping mentioned on his trip to New Zealand in November, “New Zealand will have to worry about the fact that there is more Chinese demand than you can possibly supply".
A key part of lifting on-farm performance in the sector is New Zealand’s Red Meat Profit Partnership (RMPP).
The RMPP was formed through a consortium of agribusinesses and the government in a bid to build sustainable, long-term profits in the red meat sector. Its purpose was to provide an umbrella framework those within the red meat sector could utilise for growth and improvement.
The program is the first substantial step-up in industry investment focused on lifting on-farm performance.
Follow the best
For the red meat sector to reach its ambitious targets what needs to be looked at is on-farm performance and what sets the top farmers apart from the rest.
The first part of the RMPP has been aimed at better understanding what top performance looks like and its key drivers. In-depth interviews of top farmers found some key attributes. The main ones include:
The key attributes and practices of top farmers from the RMPP findings were heavily weighted toward ‘softer’ attributes and key farm management practices utilised to achieve top financial performance.
Room for optimism
There is plenty of room for optimism in the red meat sector despite the challenges it faces. There is no rocket science or too many secrets around the attributes and farm management practices needed to achieve top performance year-in and year-out.
First and foremost it comes back to one’s business motivations and goals. Ultimately farmers need the motivation and willingness to be able to reach the top. This is the same for any business.
The second aspect is having the right skillset and team. This involves investing in oneself, as well as having a skilled team. Equally, it involves having access to specialists who can provide quality advice in key areas to guide decisions.
Having the right skillset, team and access to specialists allows all the basics of farm management to be executed to an above-average standard on a more regular basis, leading to superior performance.
The link between the key drivers and successfully carrying out the connected farm-management practices is weaker with mid-tier farmers compared to their higher-performing counterparts. This suggests that most farmers have a sense of what needs to be done to perform at higher levels but it is only the top performers who know how to consistently execute.
We’ve analysed benchmarking data to help draw out which areas of the more measurable aspects of a farm are more or less important determinants of profit. Our findings regarding the key benchmark relationships are:
Cameron Bagrie is chief economist at ANZ NZ and Con Williams a rural economist at ANZ NZ.
The views and opinions expressed in this communication are those of the author and may not necessarily state or reflect those of ANZ.
22 Jul 2014
20 Nov 2014
23 Jun 2014