Bishop: an uncertain world needs leadership not populism

JULIE BISHOP: It concerns me to an extent. The world is currently looking for leadership and the old order that managed such crises in the past is fraying. It hasn’t disappeared but it is fraying at the edges.

When the UN Security Council can rarely agree, when the US is taking an unorthodox approach to foreign policy, when Britain is consumed with Brexit, when leaders around the world no longer have the popular support they once had, I fear one of the biggest concerns we have is leadership.

And while there have been dire global events in the past, there have always been strong, focussed leaders to take us through them. I think that’s lacking at present.

FARHAN FARUQUI: Do you think the world is looking for leaders in all the wrong places?

JULIE BISHOP: Populism worries me immensely. I understand politicians must design attractive policies to get elected but everything is too short term.

There’s a tendency for populist leaders to win support because they promise outcomes which will be popular in the short term but we all know in the long term will be detrimental.

That’s a level of populism we’re seeing in many countries around the world, and that I think is a concern.

FARHAN FARUQUI: When you look at some of the countries around the region – and Australia is one of them – there’s a growing need to balance and manage relationships with the two superpowers.

As the stress between US and China elevates, what advice would you give to countries trying to thread that needle?

JULIE BISHOP: We’ve lived in a unipolar world since the end of the Cold War. What we are seeing is an emerging global power in China and history has shown when an emerging power comes up against an existing power, there are consequences.

What we must do is ensure those consequences are peaceful and - as friends of China as allies of the US - it is incumbent upon us to impress upon both the importance of working together.

That is why I am hopeful the trade difficulties will ultimately end in a very positive agreement between China and the US.

Of course Australia is not the only country with this dilemma. About 120 countries around the world count China as their biggest trading partner. The US has a significant network of alliances around the world. Most countries are caught up in this one way or another.

I think it is going to take leadership. It is going to take honest and frank discussion. We all must continue discussions to build on the relationships we have.

Personal relationships matter a lot in the field of foreign affairs, diplomacy and international relations. I think we’ll steer our way through.

FARHAN FARUQUI: Is it inevitable that the world becomes more protectionist?

JULIE BISHOP: We are seeing worrying strains of protectionism around the world and in some unexpected places - the US is an obvious example - a champion of free trade for many years, and has since pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

What I think is interesting is that the remaining 11 countries went ahead and concluded the agreement without the US when so many said that was impossible.

With the leadership of Japanese Prime Minister Abe, Malcolm Turnbull and others, we concluded the TPP-11, one of the highest standard free-trade deals in the world. That alone is proof we can resist protectionism.

Obviously the World Trade Organisation needs reform – it’s not perfect. I know Australia is advocating for positive reform. And I think the activity from the US will be the impetus required for that change to occur.

FARHAN FARUQUI: So you’re optimistic that we’re not entering an irreversible era of protectionism?

JULIE BISHOP: (It’s) not irreversible.

Shane White is Content Manager, Institutional at ANZ

This article is an edited version of a discussion held at an ANZ-sponsored AustCham event in Hong Kong originally published on ANZ’s Institutional website.