The four waves of Australia's Asian ties

Nearly half a century ago, Geoffrey Blainey's The Tyranny of Distance argued Australia's geographic position shaped our psychological attitudes. The long distance between Australia and our colonial forebears in Europe and the United States made us unsure of our future economic prosperity.

At about the time Blainey was writing, Donald Horne's The Lucky Country described a resource-rich Australia that lacked intellectual confidence to make the most of its natural wealth.

"This is a story of how by some crucial breakthroughs, Australia has replaced the tyranny of distance with the power of proximity."
Tim Harcourt, Fellow in Economics, UNSW Business School

Singapore's long-standing Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew also famously warned Australia risked becoming the 'poor white trash of Asia' and advised vast natural mineral wealth was neither necessary nor sufficient for long-term prosperity.

In these years, however, Japan had already succeeded the United Kingdom as Australia's major trading partner: the Australian economy had begun its long journey toward greater engagement with the Asia-Pacific.

Australia's post-World War Two economic relationship with Asia can be seen in terms of four 'waves' – concluding with the rise of trade in services. This is a story of how, by some crucial breakthroughs, Australia has replaced the tyranny of distance with the power of proximity.


In 1957, just 12 years after the end of World War II, Australian Trade Minister John McEwen signed a commercial agreement with Japan. This agreement gave Australia a 'beachhead' in Asia and launched the Australian tradition of bipartisan support for increased trade with the region.

There followed a flurry of trade and, later, investment between Japan and Australia. By 1966 Japan had surpassed the UK in our trading partner ranks – and Japan was transforming itself from a nation devastated by war into a huge and affluent economy.


As Japan re-entered the world economy followed closely by South Korea, China remained closed to the world with little economic engagement outside its borders.

Australian relations with China, however, warmed dramatically after Gough Whitlam visited Beijing (then Peking) as Leader of the Opposition in 1971 and formally established diplomatic relations when elected Prime Minister in 1972.

Whether because of this or our support for China's entry into the World Trade Organisation, China now regards Australia as a key economic partner.


Lee Kuan Yew's admonitions came back to haunt Australia in the recession of 1982-83 when, despite a resources boom, the economy was stagnating beneath double digit unemployment and inflation.

In response, government reforms opened up the Australian economy and oriented it even more toward Asia – and did so while maintaining social harmony through an Accord with the trade unions (as represented by the ACTU, the Australian Council of Trade Unions).

The exchange rate was floated, financial markets were reformed, universal health care and a pension scheme were introduced alongside education reforms aimed at boosting productivity.

As for trade, the tariff wall that had kept Australia isolated for a century was taken down brick by brick. Australia supported trade liberalisation through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the World Trade Organisation and the creation of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.


Today Australia is entering its fourth wave of engagement with Asia. In terms of trading partners, China has superseded Japan – so further realignment of the global economic order will again alter Australia's trade. The emergence of several ASEAN states in addition to China and India will take us through this new phase of engagement.

The fourth wave will look very different to its predecessors. First, we are now well situated within established Asia and are able to expand into emerging Asia. We have formed beachheads in ASEAN, China and India now some of the frontier markets - including Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar in the Mekong Delta and Mongolia and Kazakhstan in Central Asia – are opening up.

Secondly, whilst our larger corporates have already formed strong relationships in Asia, the nature of global supply chains and open regionalism means that Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will become increasingly enmeshed. Asia now provides seven out of 10 of our top SME exporter destinations.

Thirdly, whilst the first waves of our engagement with Asia have been focused on mining and agriculture, steel and iron ore, and pumping LNG offshore to the region, services will now play a more important role.

Rocks and crops will continue to provide the lion's share of our export revenue to Asia but our points of engagement with Asia will expand as services trade promotes broader and deeper people-to-people relationships.

Second tier cities in China like Chongqing and Chengdu are full of Australian architects and engineers, as are parts of India, Mongolia, Kazakhstan and South East Asia. We also need to raise the export orientation of agribusiness so Australia can move from the mining boom to the dining boom.

Click image to zoom Tap image to zoom

Photo credit: zhu difeng /

Services complement the role advanced manufactures play in our trade, they are not a substitute for (or alternative to) them. Goods exports build a platform that enables services trade to grow throughout the region and bring with it opportunities for investment, niches for SMEs, and richer global and regional integration.

There will be challenges as we pursue the fourth wave of Asian engagement, particularly given the ongoing risk and potential for external shocks within the global economy after the GFC.

Climate change poses a serious threat but also represents an opportunity for Australian environmental services exporters – especially those engaged in sectors like green building and environmental transport and infrastructure in China, India and Indonesia.

Australia's economic relationship with Asia has taken many twists and turns as we have grappled with the changing economic landscape of the region.

As Australia looks for new sources of global opportunity in the 21st century, there are some positive early signs from this fourth wave of Australia's engagement with the region – signs that we are really starting to benefit from the power of proximity in the Asian Century.

Tim Harcourt is the JW Nevile Fellow in Economics at UNSW Business School.

The views and opinions expressed in this communication are those of the author and may not necessarily state or reflect those of ANZ.

editor's picks

01 Oct 2015

Can Australia afford not to be in Asia?

Andrew Parker | Partner & Asia Practice Leader, PWC

Having lived and worked in Asia for a decade and a half, I'm very aware Australians do not adapt easily to the uniquely 'Asian Way' when it comes to business dealings. Asia is obviously different but uncomfortably so for many of those businesses with which I've worked.

17 Sep 2015

Is Australia really prepared for the Asian Century?

Helen Clark | Freelance journalist & former Asian correspondent

We are in the Asian Century but what does that mean? For Australia, there is a challenge in simply recognising the importance of understanding Asia and the varied cultures and the languages. But what is Australia's real understanding of the region and is it greater than it might have been 20 or 30 years ago?

22 Oct 2015

The unparalleled Asian opportunity

Mark Hand | Group Executive Australia Retail and Commercial Banking, ANZ

For companies of all sizes, for those that can expand into the region, meet the right people and build the right relationships – along with the right products and business strategies - the Asian opportunity is unparalleled.